← Back to context Comment by candiddevmike 12 hours ago That has been undone now, though. 3 comments candiddevmike Reply y-curious 9 hours ago Section 174 as it stands means R&D costs companies less, not more. It would be bullish for the SWE profession. It’s still around t-writescode 10 hours ago Has it? I haven’t seen anything about that. stock_toaster 8 hours ago I thought it was mostly rolled back for domestic R&D as part of the terribly named OBBBA.[1]: found a ref https://www.bnncpa.com/resources/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-...
y-curious 9 hours ago Section 174 as it stands means R&D costs companies less, not more. It would be bullish for the SWE profession. It’s still around
t-writescode 10 hours ago Has it? I haven’t seen anything about that. stock_toaster 8 hours ago I thought it was mostly rolled back for domestic R&D as part of the terribly named OBBBA.[1]: found a ref https://www.bnncpa.com/resources/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-...
stock_toaster 8 hours ago I thought it was mostly rolled back for domestic R&D as part of the terribly named OBBBA.[1]: found a ref https://www.bnncpa.com/resources/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-...
Section 174 as it stands means R&D costs companies less, not more. It would be bullish for the SWE profession. It’s still around
Has it? I haven’t seen anything about that.
I thought it was mostly rolled back for domestic R&D as part of the terribly named OBBBA.
[1]: found a ref https://www.bnncpa.com/resources/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-...