← Back to context

Comment by zmgsabst

8 hours ago

In exactly the sense my HTTPS packets are semantically emptier than my HTTP packets.

I think it's more like that you are signalling by your use of HTTPS at all, and the packet body itself is encrypted nonsense.

Hiding information in the protocol layer while the bulk content that is "supposed" to contain the meaning is present but actually meaningless. Or for a physical analogy the payload of the envelope vis a decoy and the real information is hidden in the way the flap is sealed.

Well, if your HTTPS packets are somehow more retarded than your HTTP packets, yes.

  • I use HTTPS because it makes my packets “more retarded” than the HTTP version of those packets to anybody without the session key to decrypt the “retarded nonsense”.

    That’s literally the whole point of encryption:

    Your message becomes unintelligible to those who aren’t able to decode the content.

    • Except encryption isn’t made to protect enlightened few from stupid masses and their “poor” understanding. If you have something secret to say to other managers then just send an email to a mailing list. Assuming that only you and your clique understand the message directed at specific people is an insult to people around you.