← Back to context Comment by gpvos 4 hours ago MS could easily have added proper UTF-8 support in the early 2000s instead of the late 2010s. 1 comment gpvos Reply kstrauser 3 hours ago Yep. It would've been a better landing pad than UTF-16 since they had to migrate off UCS-2 anyway.
kstrauser 3 hours ago Yep. It would've been a better landing pad than UTF-16 since they had to migrate off UCS-2 anyway.
Yep. It would've been a better landing pad than UTF-16 since they had to migrate off UCS-2 anyway.