← Back to context Comment by Retr0id 1 month ago That's emphatically not what it claims. 2 comments Retr0id Reply Someone1234 1 month ago https://www.gally.net/miscellaneous/hn-em-dash-user-leaderbo...So if EM-Dash is good proof of AI usage, and people who we can see didn't use AI / or predate AI being popular, are flagged, then that undercuts it by a lot. torben-friis 1 month ago >Top 50 users by number of posts containing em dashes (—) before November 30, 2022, when ChatGPT was released
Someone1234 1 month ago https://www.gally.net/miscellaneous/hn-em-dash-user-leaderbo...So if EM-Dash is good proof of AI usage, and people who we can see didn't use AI / or predate AI being popular, are flagged, then that undercuts it by a lot. torben-friis 1 month ago >Top 50 users by number of posts containing em dashes (—) before November 30, 2022, when ChatGPT was released
torben-friis 1 month ago >Top 50 users by number of posts containing em dashes (—) before November 30, 2022, when ChatGPT was released
https://www.gally.net/miscellaneous/hn-em-dash-user-leaderbo...
So if EM-Dash is good proof of AI usage, and people who we can see didn't use AI / or predate AI being popular, are flagged, then that undercuts it by a lot.
>Top 50 users by number of posts containing em dashes (—) before November 30, 2022, when ChatGPT was released