← Back to context Comment by computably 2 months ago > why not just use x86-64?Uh, because you can't? It's not open in any meaningful sense. 9 comments computably Reply userbinator 2 months ago The original amd64 came out in 2003. Any patents on the original instruction set have long expired, and even more so for 32-bit x86. panick21_ 2 months ago Its not about patents. Believe what you want but there is a reason nobody else is doing x86 or ARM chips unless they are allowed by the owner. dbdr 2 months ago You're probably right. It would be helpful to say what the reason is, if it's not patents. 6 replies →
userbinator 2 months ago The original amd64 came out in 2003. Any patents on the original instruction set have long expired, and even more so for 32-bit x86. panick21_ 2 months ago Its not about patents. Believe what you want but there is a reason nobody else is doing x86 or ARM chips unless they are allowed by the owner. dbdr 2 months ago You're probably right. It would be helpful to say what the reason is, if it's not patents. 6 replies →
panick21_ 2 months ago Its not about patents. Believe what you want but there is a reason nobody else is doing x86 or ARM chips unless they are allowed by the owner. dbdr 2 months ago You're probably right. It would be helpful to say what the reason is, if it's not patents. 6 replies →
dbdr 2 months ago You're probably right. It would be helpful to say what the reason is, if it's not patents. 6 replies →
The original amd64 came out in 2003. Any patents on the original instruction set have long expired, and even more so for 32-bit x86.
Its not about patents. Believe what you want but there is a reason nobody else is doing x86 or ARM chips unless they are allowed by the owner.
You're probably right. It would be helpful to say what the reason is, if it's not patents.
6 replies →