← Back to context

Comment by chid

2 days ago

I haven't heard of any recent discussion on the impact of AI on schooling. I agree with you entirely but curious to read any recent thinking on this.

It is horrendous - it seems that oral verification is required to test pupils skills - this does not scale. People not using LLMs to finish assignments are getting penalized by lower grades, people using llms to finish assignmnets learn nothing.

  • Why would oral verification be needed? Hand-written answers on paper in a proctored classroom should still work fine. That was the way most verification worked when I was in school, and still is the most used verification method used currently around me.

    Homework assignments are harder, but those were always a bit difficult for teachers. It's not like cheating was invented by Gen Z...

    • Gen Z definitely didn’t invent cheating, but LLMs brought qualitative difference and scale. That changes the properties of the system.

      During my university most courses had a good mixture of take-home assignments/projects and in-class exams. Yes, people could always cheat either through plagiarism (usually easily caught) or at the extreme by getting someone else to do the work (which I have never personally seen).

      Anecdotal data around me shows:

      * outright paper/assignment generation via LLM

      * using chatGPT as a “professor” proofreading and polishing course work before submission (arguably good use but depends on the personal effort)

      * avoiding reading by asking chatGPT for summaries

      * using chatGPT to help explain various concepts (this is a good example of using LLMs as a source for learning…accepting that occasionally they can lie)

      In a small classroom where a good teacher-student interaction happens, I guess it’s easier to catch people cheating. But some universities (maybe most) have massive classes where a professor may never have an actual conversation with some students. That context makes cheating harder to detect.

      I accept my outlook on this may be a bit bleaker (hopefully), but saying it’s business as usual is at the other extreme.

      1 reply →