← Back to context

Comment by kevinh

10 days ago

Slippery slope is famously a fallacious argument. My first exposure to it was people insisting that legalizing gay marriage would end up legalizing marriage to animals.

A slippery slope is only a fallacy if there is no demonstrated history of it existing. I think we're all aware that that is not the case for surveillance laws.

"If this observable trend continues, it will eventually reach a point that is along this trajectory" is not a fallacy.