← Back to context

Comment by raw_anon_1111

19 hours ago

Ask the people at Twitter..

You mean the 80% of the workforce that was fired and the company continued running just fine?

Usually just firing 3 to 5% of any company workers have terrible consequences for the company that does it.

It does not speak so well about the workers.

  • He also cut 80% of the traffic... And the fact that it kept running with him willy nilly pulling network cables is a credit to the work they did to make it resilient to failure.

  • I don't understand this take. Do people think engineers go in to work to turn handcranks to keep the machines running? It's actually a credit to the automation built by the engineers he fired that it kept running!

    At the time I joked that like Chaos Monkey, we should have an "Elon Monkey" to "fire" arbitrary people by sending them on mandatory vacations with no connectivity to see what falls over.

    • the people that built the infrastructure that runs twitter left before he showed up. most of it was written by a half dozen people that left around 2016.

  • It was significantly worst, could not keep ads, became overrun by bots. The quality went down significantly. And earnings too.

> Ask the people at Twitter

The ones with stock options in, now, SpaceX?

  • Stock options aren’t magic. I bet you that the remaining Twitter employees won’t see a higher comp than equivalent employees at BigTech companies between their cash + RSUs when SpaceX IPOs.

    Aren’t employees also subject to a lock out period where they still can’t sell their stock until $x number of months after an IPO unlike employees of public companies that can sell as soon as they vest?

    Honest question, I’ve worked for public $BigTech but haven’t been at a company pre IPO