← Back to context Comment by pants2 6 hours ago You might be surprised, with NVMe swap 8GB is surprisingly capable. ~1.6GB/s Read/Write. 4 comments pants2 Reply AnthonyMouse 2 hours ago Flash has finite write endurance. NVMe swap can burn through it pretty quick. Which is isn't that bad because if it wears out you can replace it... unless the drive is soldered. serf 3 hours ago the slowest DDR4 is capable of 12.6GB/s~ish per channel .nowhere near the same performance. Dylan16807 1 minute ago The ratio between RAM speed and SSD speed is unimportant. Useful swap just needs a fast drive. teaearlgraycold 3 hours ago Apple has a great zram implementation as well.
AnthonyMouse 2 hours ago Flash has finite write endurance. NVMe swap can burn through it pretty quick. Which is isn't that bad because if it wears out you can replace it... unless the drive is soldered.
serf 3 hours ago the slowest DDR4 is capable of 12.6GB/s~ish per channel .nowhere near the same performance. Dylan16807 1 minute ago The ratio between RAM speed and SSD speed is unimportant. Useful swap just needs a fast drive.
Dylan16807 1 minute ago The ratio between RAM speed and SSD speed is unimportant. Useful swap just needs a fast drive.
Flash has finite write endurance. NVMe swap can burn through it pretty quick. Which is isn't that bad because if it wears out you can replace it... unless the drive is soldered.
the slowest DDR4 is capable of 12.6GB/s~ish per channel .
nowhere near the same performance.
The ratio between RAM speed and SSD speed is unimportant. Useful swap just needs a fast drive.
Apple has a great zram implementation as well.