Comment by CharlieDigital
9 days ago
You can solve the same problem by giving subsets of MCP tools to subagents so each subagent is responsible for only a subset of tools.
Or...just don't slam 100 tools into your agent in the first place.
9 days ago
You can solve the same problem by giving subsets of MCP tools to subagents so each subagent is responsible for only a subset of tools.
Or...just don't slam 100 tools into your agent in the first place.
>Or...just don't slam 100 tools into your agent in the first place.
But I can do them with CLI so that's a negative for MCP?
You've missed the point and hyperfocused on the story around context and not why an org would want to have centralized servers exposing MCP endpoints instead of CLIs
I would want to know what point I missed. I can have 100 CLI's but not 100 MCP tools.
100 MCP tools will bloat the context whereas 100 CLI's won't. Which part do you disagree with?
2 replies →