← Back to context Comment by thinkingtoilet 15 hours ago The reasons are neither flippant or arbitrary. 2 comments thinkingtoilet Reply kspacewalk2 13 hours ago What is the law being broken?"Lack of regulation clarity on your part does not constitute a crime on mine". Why is that not a valid defence? JumpCrisscross 10 hours ago > What is the law being broken?“In most jurisdictions, death threats are a serious type of criminal offence” [1].[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_threat#Legality
kspacewalk2 13 hours ago What is the law being broken?"Lack of regulation clarity on your part does not constitute a crime on mine". Why is that not a valid defence? JumpCrisscross 10 hours ago > What is the law being broken?“In most jurisdictions, death threats are a serious type of criminal offence” [1].[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_threat#Legality
JumpCrisscross 10 hours ago > What is the law being broken?“In most jurisdictions, death threats are a serious type of criminal offence” [1].[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_threat#Legality
What is the law being broken?
"Lack of regulation clarity on your part does not constitute a crime on mine". Why is that not a valid defence?
> What is the law being broken?
“In most jurisdictions, death threats are a serious type of criminal offence” [1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_threat#Legality