← Back to context Comment by mhuffman 5 hours ago I have been using this one[0] and it is small, fast, and seems to work pretty great for me so far.[0]https://github.com/wong-justin/vic 1 comment mhuffman Reply wonger_ 3 hours ago Happy to hear! Some of my thoughts when building it:- I haven't implemented audio support yet, but it would be nice- I like --dry-run- I didn't use a TUI widget library, but now it's at the point where it's tedious to refactor the UI / make it prettier- I like OP's timeline widget- Wanted to focus on static binaries. I got chafa static linking working for Linux, but haven't bundled ffmpeg yet- which reminds me of licenses -- chafa and ffmpeg are LGPL iirc- a couple other notes from early on: https://wonger.dev/posts/chafa-ffmpeg-progress
wonger_ 3 hours ago Happy to hear! Some of my thoughts when building it:- I haven't implemented audio support yet, but it would be nice- I like --dry-run- I didn't use a TUI widget library, but now it's at the point where it's tedious to refactor the UI / make it prettier- I like OP's timeline widget- Wanted to focus on static binaries. I got chafa static linking working for Linux, but haven't bundled ffmpeg yet- which reminds me of licenses -- chafa and ffmpeg are LGPL iirc- a couple other notes from early on: https://wonger.dev/posts/chafa-ffmpeg-progress
Happy to hear! Some of my thoughts when building it:
- I haven't implemented audio support yet, but it would be nice
- I like --dry-run
- I didn't use a TUI widget library, but now it's at the point where it's tedious to refactor the UI / make it prettier
- I like OP's timeline widget
- Wanted to focus on static binaries. I got chafa static linking working for Linux, but haven't bundled ffmpeg yet
- which reminds me of licenses -- chafa and ffmpeg are LGPL iirc
- a couple other notes from early on: https://wonger.dev/posts/chafa-ffmpeg-progress