Comment by indolering
4 hours ago
> DNSSEC is moribund.
You’ve clearly put a lot of effort into limiting adoption. I’d really value your thoughts on this response to your anti-DNSSEC arguments:
4 hours ago
> DNSSEC is moribund.
You’ve clearly put a lot of effort into limiting adoption. I’d really value your thoughts on this response to your anti-DNSSEC arguments:
I'm sure you can find several of those using the search bar. The argument has gotten a lot grimmer since 2015 --- DNSSEC lost deployment in North America over the last couple years. It didn't simply plateau off and stop growing: people have started turning it off. That corresponds with the success of CT in the WebPKI, with multi-perspective lookup, with the failure of DANE stapling in tls-wg, and with domain hijacking through registrar fixing.
[flagged]
I feel pretty confident that the search bar refutes this claim you're making. What you're trying to argue is that I've avoided opportunities to argue about DNSSEC on HN. Seems... unlikely.
1 reply →