← Back to context Comment by PunchyHamster 6 days ago the market didn't. The investors did 3 comments PunchyHamster Reply happytoexplain 6 days ago I guess I think of the investors as more representative of "The Market" than the traditional entities (producers, consumers) - which is the whole problem. choilive 6 days ago Investors are not part of the market? xp84 6 days ago The investors? They were part of the market. But after the front fell off they’ve been towed outside the market.And it’s perfectly safe out there. There’s nothing out there but mission statements and TAM slides and pea-protein slurry.And $1.8 billion of burned cash.
happytoexplain 6 days ago I guess I think of the investors as more representative of "The Market" than the traditional entities (producers, consumers) - which is the whole problem.
choilive 6 days ago Investors are not part of the market? xp84 6 days ago The investors? They were part of the market. But after the front fell off they’ve been towed outside the market.And it’s perfectly safe out there. There’s nothing out there but mission statements and TAM slides and pea-protein slurry.And $1.8 billion of burned cash.
xp84 6 days ago The investors? They were part of the market. But after the front fell off they’ve been towed outside the market.And it’s perfectly safe out there. There’s nothing out there but mission statements and TAM slides and pea-protein slurry.And $1.8 billion of burned cash.
I guess I think of the investors as more representative of "The Market" than the traditional entities (producers, consumers) - which is the whole problem.
Investors are not part of the market?
The investors? They were part of the market. But after the front fell off they’ve been towed outside the market.
And it’s perfectly safe out there. There’s nothing out there but mission statements and TAM slides and pea-protein slurry.
And $1.8 billion of burned cash.