← Back to context

Comment by bradley13

3 months ago

Sure, but the fact remains that it was referred for criminal prosecution. They didn't follow through, this time, but the victim still had his "lesson" about insulting his betters.

And Germany really did sentence people for calling Mr. Habeck "Schwachkopf", which is about as mild an insult as you can find.

> And Germany really did sentence people for calling Mr. Habeck "Schwachkopf", which is about as mild an insult as you can find.

Did not know about this, here is the wiki: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwachkopf-Aff%C3%A4re

His house was searched because of it, but he did not get sentenced for it.

Reminds me of Pimmelgate https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Grote#Umstrittene_Reaktio...

  • There is a strong hint in the search warrant, that they knew about the distribution of Nazi materials.

    Just calling someone Schwachkopf doesn’t get prosecutors to investigate further.

    • Weeeeeell .. to counter that argument there is pimmelgate. I know it was not legit, but they searched his house, even after he was at the police station and confessed.

      That leads to selv censorship, even if what you did was legal.

      1 reply →

Germany really did not. Where do you get such nonsense?

The guy was sentenced for distributing forbidden Nazi materials.

The initial insult investigation was dropped, because of it being insignificant.