Comment by intended

This is how bad journalism results in conspiracy theories.

I looked at the original analysis and it was fraught with language that leads to specific conclusions. It was most certainly LLM aided, if not generated.

I am not ascribing malice, but the author seems inexperienced with the repercussions of making assertions out of partial knowledge.

Also: Good grief, this article is also written via LLM! Human+machine comes up with theory that goes viral, and then Humans+machines amplify it? Is this the brilliant future we have to look forward to?