← Back to context Comment by nixpulvis 5 days ago I never want to read another Bean or log4j config ever again. 4 comments nixpulvis Reply bigbuppo 5 days ago Didn't they all switch to convention over configuration and dependency injection so now your configuration is your source code? lmm 5 days ago Some people did but that's actually worse. Your configuration comes magically out of nowhere and when it breaks you can't fix it. rubzah 5 days ago Nobody ever wanted to wire up RPC endpoints, in the form of Enterprise JavaBeans(tm), using XML files. That is one for the history books of ridiculous technology. 1 reply →
bigbuppo 5 days ago Didn't they all switch to convention over configuration and dependency injection so now your configuration is your source code? lmm 5 days ago Some people did but that's actually worse. Your configuration comes magically out of nowhere and when it breaks you can't fix it. rubzah 5 days ago Nobody ever wanted to wire up RPC endpoints, in the form of Enterprise JavaBeans(tm), using XML files. That is one for the history books of ridiculous technology. 1 reply →
lmm 5 days ago Some people did but that's actually worse. Your configuration comes magically out of nowhere and when it breaks you can't fix it. rubzah 5 days ago Nobody ever wanted to wire up RPC endpoints, in the form of Enterprise JavaBeans(tm), using XML files. That is one for the history books of ridiculous technology. 1 reply →
rubzah 5 days ago Nobody ever wanted to wire up RPC endpoints, in the form of Enterprise JavaBeans(tm), using XML files. That is one for the history books of ridiculous technology. 1 reply →
Didn't they all switch to convention over configuration and dependency injection so now your configuration is your source code?
Some people did but that's actually worse. Your configuration comes magically out of nowhere and when it breaks you can't fix it.
Nobody ever wanted to wire up RPC endpoints, in the form of Enterprise JavaBeans(tm), using XML files. That is one for the history books of ridiculous technology.
1 reply →