Comment by wvbdmp
5 days ago
On the contrary, it’s unfortunate that this space can’t just be an island of stability, where things keep working the way they always have and new features are added unobtrusively. Instead we get surface-level change for the sake of change as well as slop and surveillance nobody asked for, and are still missing conveniences that have been table-stakes on mobile for years. It would be a a step in the right direction if Windows would simply stop disrupting itself.
> it’s unfortunate that this space can’t just be an island of stability, where things keep working the way they always have and new features are added unobtrusively
There are plenty of Linux operating systems that prize stability over feature richness. They work fine if that's your workflow. Most folks' workflows, unfortunately, are not that.
>There are plenty of Linux operating systems that prize stability over feature richness.
It's a choice between arbitrary changes and constant redesigns every 4-5 years, versus bare-bones distros and DEs.
The parent asks for a third option: well featured, mature, distros that don't change for the sake of it, but still have the features.
> well featured, mature, distros that don't change for the sake of it, but still have the features
I’m arguing this niche barely exists. Folks who want to run modern software tend to want something that “looks” modern.
1 reply →
fedora. stable, not bleeding edge but frequently updated (twice a year).