← Back to context Comment by loeg 5 hours ago This isn't responsive to the article. Please avoid generic tangents. 1 comment loeg Reply jockm 1 hour ago I disagree, it was a response to the article's title. I could have said it better, but it wasn't just a random rant
jockm 1 hour ago I disagree, it was a response to the article's title. I could have said it better, but it wasn't just a random rant
I disagree, it was a response to the article's title. I could have said it better, but it wasn't just a random rant