← Back to context Comment by kulahan 4 days ago less than 30% isn't really something I'd call common 2 comments kulahan Reply mrhyyyyde 3 days ago Okay, would you consider 1 in 3 to be rare? kulahan 3 days ago I’m saying that even if I blindly accept that it’s actually 30%, that’s not much. Calling it rare seems much more reasonable than calling it common.
mrhyyyyde 3 days ago Okay, would you consider 1 in 3 to be rare? kulahan 3 days ago I’m saying that even if I blindly accept that it’s actually 30%, that’s not much. Calling it rare seems much more reasonable than calling it common.
kulahan 3 days ago I’m saying that even if I blindly accept that it’s actually 30%, that’s not much. Calling it rare seems much more reasonable than calling it common.
Okay, would you consider 1 in 3 to be rare?
I’m saying that even if I blindly accept that it’s actually 30%, that’s not much. Calling it rare seems much more reasonable than calling it common.