Comment by blub
15 days ago
A good rule of thumb for programming languages is to check what the general recommendation is on HN and do the opposite.
Using win32 from Rust is nonsensical. This is the kind of use-one-tool-for-any-job Visual Basic 6 programmers used to have, except VB6 would have actually been much better than Rust at Windows programming.
My reply was about Win32 and typical C++ development. Obviously other projects may be best written in C# or other languages and frameworks.
Anyway, Microsoft is the one providing the Rust crate(s) I linked, and according to the releases it seems they are using them internally too. I do not see what is "nonsensical" about using them, and I have used them in the past just fine, just like I used Win32 from C++ in the past.