← Back to context

Comment by nurettin

4 days ago

I was wondering who convinced ARM to manufacture hardware. Turns out it was Meta.

Now if only they would go back to being "Acorn RISC Machines" and make a nice desktop home computer again...

One can dream.

  • DGX Spark is pretty nice. It could be cheaper if they removed the NIC though.

    • I have the ASUS variant. I like it well enough.

      I see the NIC as a form of future proofing, but we'll see.

      My Ryzen 9 mini-PC from 2 years ago outperforms this thing in raw CPU Though.

  • I hate RISC OS architecturally, but if they made a new Archimedes or whatever that ran it I'd buy it

Fabless. Like AMD and Nvidia. So I would think about it more as branding and packaging than Manufacturing

  • Huh, many companies use TSMC, in fact, probably all of them use TSMC, including Intel, yet there are only a few who dominates in performance. There are much more in designing chips than what you just listed.

    • Intel uses its own fabs for certain IP, tsmc for others yeah. As far as I've seen the latest greatest Panther Lake that stuff is made in intel's arizona fabs.

  • There's a big difference between just providing IP and actually doing the physical design, manufacturing and packaging. You can't just send your RTL to TSMC and magically get packaged chips back.

    I haven't ever ordered an ARM SoC but I also wouldn't be surprised if there were significant parts that they left up to integrators before - PLLs, pads, SRAM etc.