If you read past the marketing talk, this is basically a massively multicore system (136) with significantly reduced power usage (300W).
Where does Agentic come into this? ARMs explanation is that future Agentic workloads will be both CPU and GPU bound thus the need for significant CPU efficiency.
If you read past the marketing talk, this is basically a massively multicore system (136) with significantly reduced power usage (300W).
Where does Agentic come into this? ARMs explanation is that future Agentic workloads will be both CPU and GPU bound thus the need for significant CPU efficiency.
Big "but mongodb is web scale" vibes
We just say words now that sound good for marketing but have no real meaning.
> now
I’d argue we have always done that, and in fact it’s basically the definition of marketing!
It's volume of tokens consumed x number of agents x rack space. Basically agentic computation density.
How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_many_angels_can_dance_on_t...
It's a code sentence for let's go to the utility room to cross pollinate ideas.
Lots of isolated firecracker instances for openclaw like agents.
It's when LLM agents are inefficient that you need a whole rack of servers to get shit done.
I was gonna say just big DCs in marketing yap but really wtf does that mean?
Translation: “Can you give us some money pretty please?”