← Back to context Comment by yunwal 14 hours ago Go and “simple tooling” don’t really belong in the same sentence. Powerful tooling, sure, but simple? 2 comments yunwal Reply g947o 12 hours ago Would be helpful if you elaborate which part is not simple.Coming from C++ and JavaScript, there aren't many languages that can claim to have "simpler" tooling than Go. shepherdjerred 11 hours ago The tools aren’t bad any more, but you do need a few liners to write safe code. But that’s the case for most languages
g947o 12 hours ago Would be helpful if you elaborate which part is not simple.Coming from C++ and JavaScript, there aren't many languages that can claim to have "simpler" tooling than Go. shepherdjerred 11 hours ago The tools aren’t bad any more, but you do need a few liners to write safe code. But that’s the case for most languages
shepherdjerred 11 hours ago The tools aren’t bad any more, but you do need a few liners to write safe code. But that’s the case for most languages
Would be helpful if you elaborate which part is not simple.
Coming from C++ and JavaScript, there aren't many languages that can claim to have "simpler" tooling than Go.
The tools aren’t bad any more, but you do need a few liners to write safe code. But that’s the case for most languages