← Back to context Comment by fhouser 3 months ago Hot take: You should want to review your agents' output and progress. 5 comments fhouser Reply vidarh 3 months ago I prefer to have my agents review my agents output and progress, and have them improve the prompts for future runs. jawiggins 3 months ago Yeah totally, you don't have to auto-merge anything - you can review the PRs yourself fhouser 3 months ago Yeah, I think that's the most important part in these new types of processes. Although it is tempting to just let an agent run with it for a while. the_real_cher 3 months ago This project should be called the Rube Goldeberg machine creator. fhouser 3 months ago The Hitchhiker's Guide to issue-tracking.
vidarh 3 months ago I prefer to have my agents review my agents output and progress, and have them improve the prompts for future runs.
jawiggins 3 months ago Yeah totally, you don't have to auto-merge anything - you can review the PRs yourself fhouser 3 months ago Yeah, I think that's the most important part in these new types of processes. Although it is tempting to just let an agent run with it for a while.
fhouser 3 months ago Yeah, I think that's the most important part in these new types of processes. Although it is tempting to just let an agent run with it for a while.
the_real_cher 3 months ago This project should be called the Rube Goldeberg machine creator. fhouser 3 months ago The Hitchhiker's Guide to issue-tracking.
I prefer to have my agents review my agents output and progress, and have them improve the prompts for future runs.
Yeah totally, you don't have to auto-merge anything - you can review the PRs yourself
Yeah, I think that's the most important part in these new types of processes. Although it is tempting to just let an agent run with it for a while.
This project should be called the Rube Goldeberg machine creator.
The Hitchhiker's Guide to issue-tracking.