← Back to context

Comment by longislandguido

19 hours ago

[flagged]

This is just silly. In what way is a $600 netbook their flagship product when then also ship wildly successful 128GB MacBook Pros and 256GB Mac Studios?

I was more disapointed when they dropped the 512GB Mac Studio than I am the loss of the Mac Pro. My hope is that they'll launch something really useful at the WWDC to make up for that.

Except by most all regards that product is great.

  • By "great" do you mean 8GB of non-upgradable soldered RAM in 2026?

    • It's not like Apple soldered some plain old DDR5 to a PCB to be difficult:

      1. It's TSMC's InFO_POP, which has significant performance benefits.

      2. There weren't even any modules that existed for LPDDR until very recently. (and while the A18 was being designed, it didn't exist)

      3. The power/price/performance/thermals they are able to achieve with this configuration is not possible with socketed RAM. You are asking them to make the device worse

      Go pop open a Framework with an Ryzen AI Max processor -- you won't find socketed RAM. Technology has moved on. Math coprocessors and CPU cache aren't separate modules anymore either. AMD has even said they studied the possibility of LPCAMM for Strix Halo and found that even it wasn't good enough for signal integrity.

      4 replies →

    • You realize that most customer shopping for the cheapest computer they can find are not going to upgrade their RAM.

      And Apple is effectively committing to supporting 8GB computers with their OS upgrades for years to come.

      1 reply →

    • That device was explicitly made with "not enough" memory, because if it had enough, it'd cannibalize a significant portion of their higher-margin products' sales.

      I'd argue that if memory and storage were still customer-expendable, they wouldn't have even considered making this product.