Comment by raverbashing
7 hours ago
Yes
I don't think I remember one case where jq wasn't fast enough
Now what I'd really want is a jq that's more intuitive and easier to understand
7 hours ago
Yes
I don't think I remember one case where jq wasn't fast enough
Now what I'd really want is a jq that's more intuitive and easier to understand
> Now what I'd really want is a jq that's more intuitive and easier to understand
Unfortunately I don’t recall the name, but there was something submitted to HN not too long ago (I think it was still 2026) which was like jq but used JavaScript syntax.