← Back to context Comment by messh 20 hours ago How is this different than say bubblewrap and others? 3 comments messh Reply girvo 20 hours ago https://jai.scs.stanford.edu/comparison.html#jai-vs-bubblewr...> bubblewrap is more flexible and works without root. jai is more opinionated and requires far less ceremony for the common case. The 15-flag bwrap invocation that turns into a wrapper script is exactly the friction jai is designed to remove.Plus some other comparisons, check the page attentive 16 hours ago bubblewrap is in many modern distros standard packages.With all the supply chain issues these days onboarding new tools carries extra risks. So, question is if it's worth it.
girvo 20 hours ago https://jai.scs.stanford.edu/comparison.html#jai-vs-bubblewr...> bubblewrap is more flexible and works without root. jai is more opinionated and requires far less ceremony for the common case. The 15-flag bwrap invocation that turns into a wrapper script is exactly the friction jai is designed to remove.Plus some other comparisons, check the page attentive 16 hours ago bubblewrap is in many modern distros standard packages.With all the supply chain issues these days onboarding new tools carries extra risks. So, question is if it's worth it.
attentive 16 hours ago bubblewrap is in many modern distros standard packages.With all the supply chain issues these days onboarding new tools carries extra risks. So, question is if it's worth it.
https://jai.scs.stanford.edu/comparison.html#jai-vs-bubblewr...
> bubblewrap is more flexible and works without root. jai is more opinionated and requires far less ceremony for the common case. The 15-flag bwrap invocation that turns into a wrapper script is exactly the friction jai is designed to remove.
Plus some other comparisons, check the page
bubblewrap is in many modern distros standard packages.
With all the supply chain issues these days onboarding new tools carries extra risks. So, question is if it's worth it.