Comment by simonsquiff
9 hours ago
It’s only x4 more expensive to use electricity with old methods like immersion / resistance heaters
Heat pumps are 400% efficient or more, so have parity or better with gas prices
9 hours ago
It’s only x4 more expensive to use electricity with old methods like immersion / resistance heaters
Heat pumps are 400% efficient or more, so have parity or better with gas prices
Heat pump have problems to reach high enough temperatures for most industrial heat applications.
https://www.irena.org/Innovation-landscape-for-smart-electri...
With electric resistance heating you can gen very high temperatures, but with less than 100% efficiency. With electric arc heating you can melt steel, but again less than 100% efficient.
> Heat pump have problems to reach high enough temperatures for most industrial heat applications.
They do if you start from ambient temperature, but they can be more effective if they are pumping heat out of the waste heat stream of a process. This requires different working fluids than lower temperature systems, though.
Most industrial heat energy is not consumed at very high temperature. IIRC, 2/3rds is at less than 300 C.
Electric resistance heating might also allow PV to dispense with auxiliary equipment, like inverters, so even if inefficient that might not matter as much. Heat also allows easy long duration storage at scale, even at rather high temperature, so resistive heating can be used with intermittently available cheap surplus power.
That's cool but who is going to pay the upfront cost for the heat pumps? The sources I could find say we currently have 412 heat pumps per 100k people in the UK.
Ordinary people can't just afford to drop 10k for a heat pump + installation for it to pay for itself 20 years down the line.