Comment by RajT88
5 months ago
The point is - they're going to do that anyways if they want to. Owning the LLM platforms makes it marginally cheaper to do so.
It's not the risk it's being made out to be.
5 months ago
The point is - they're going to do that anyways if they want to. Owning the LLM platforms makes it marginally cheaper to do so.
It's not the risk it's being made out to be.
Absolutely. The fact that they know your app better than you do, and that they can revoke your ability to develop it at any moment, those are just details. Those things won't change the game at all.
Unless you're using their API (in which case there's always platform risk, same as before), this is not an issue. There are lots of half assed implementations of ideas by the big companies that smaller companies run circles around, Innovator's Dilemma was literally written about this.
In my opinion Christensen wasn't talking about outsourcing your entire development process to a competitor with much deeper pockets, giving them the ability to turn off your development at will [1], and then running rings around them. I'm sure you're familiar with his story about Dell and Asus. This is worse.
[1] Unless you're assuming that you maintain control over your technology while outsourcing most of the development thinking to a rented AI? Times have changed, and the API is not the only issue anymore.
1 reply →