← Back to context

Comment by khvirabyan

2 months ago

Just thinking, could it be that your coworker used Raycast to spin up a codex to review and fix the typo on the PR? And that comment was added by Raycast?

13 comments

khvirabyan

Reply
mavamaarten  2 months ago

I doubt it. I noticed a few of these comments too on our PR's. We did ask copilot for a review ton GitHub (we just add copilot as a reviewer) but not through Raycast.

crimsoneer  2 months ago

Yes, it seems very unlikely this is Copilot rather than Raycast, short of some very unexpected weirdness. I cling to that hope, anyway.

  • connorgurney  2 months ago

    Indeed. I can’t see why Copilot would promote an unrelated third-party service…

    • mcintyre1994  2 months ago

      If you click the Raycast link in one of these PRs it links to: https://gh.io/cca-raycast-docs

      So I think they’re injecting this as a tip on using Copilot, that just happens to be their integration with Raycast.

      I have no idea what their actual partnership with Raycast looks like, maybe this is part of what they offered them? But it’s not a traditional link to another product ad like it appears to be from Raycast being a link.

    • heavyset_go  2 months ago

      It's time to make some money with Copilot and one way to do that is with partnerships.

      GitHub's docs and blog make use of and feature Raycast, and I'm willing to bet that's the result of a partnership, and not because someone writing docs and blog posts happens to think Raycast is great and keeps bringing it up.