← Back to context

Comment by throwaway27448

5 hours ago

But—we clearly can't accomplish basic things. That's my point

And the reason why is those things must be profitable, and once you accept everything must be profitable, there is no ceiling to exploitation. Whereas with big things like Apollo, we didn't do it because it would make money. We did it because we decided it was the right thing to do.

Stop being a capitalist hellhole, and maybe try being a country that happens to operate under bounded capitalism, and just maybe, maybe, you can see some of that progress.

But what am I saying, cmon, that'll never happen.

  • The US in the 1960s was more capitalist than it is now (by governement size, spending, taxation, regulation and economic freeodm, too-big-to-fail, etc.).

    There has to be profit first to be able to fund big things like Apollo. Profit is good.