← Back to context

Comment by delichon

6 days ago

I am very not brave but I'd volunteer. The trip is far more awesome than anything I have planned for the rest of my life. And if the shield fails on reentry it would only hurt for a few seconds. So if the crew and the backups and their backups read this and have second thoughts, ping me.

I'm sure the other astronauts are really looking forward to fly with a person showing signs of suicidal ideation.

  • Suicide ideation and someone willing to take massive risks for something awesome are very different things

    • > The trip is far more awesome than anything I have planned for the rest of my life.

      If you would give your live for a single awsome trip (and you would still have multiple years to live), then you are likely suicidal.

      Even if it is rational because your live sucks so hard, I would still have to classify you as suicidal.

      4 replies →

  • I read this as "accepting a risk of death in exchange for getting to have the incredible experience of flying to the Moon", not that they want to die.

    • There are different outlooks on risk, but the attitude can certainly be described as cavalier towards life, and may signal something stronger.

My theory is that this is something I’d say/do aged 20, and laugh at aged 60. I’m slightly closer to 60 and am into the ‘No’ zone.

HN generally skews towards the life-affirming/death-fearing quadrant so I don't think many will relate to you here. It still seems safer than being in an active warzone which hundreds of millions of people somehow manage to tolerate.

You would probably not IRL and if you would anyway it would just mean you're not qualified for the flight. Nasa needs smart people who wants to live and succeed their mission, not people who are ok to die because muh space exploration

> I am very not brave but I'd volunteer.

>> Artemis II could fly just as easily without astronauts on board

  • I think they were saying they would sign up just for the experience, even if it's unnecessary to the program.

    • But that was exactly the point I was responding to, no? If NASA was fine with skipping the astronauts, then they would just send it unmanned, not find a random volunteer.

      1 reply →