← Back to context Comment by wat10000 6 days ago 135 missions, 2 fatal accidents, that’s not 1/10. 9 comments wat10000 Reply tonymet 6 days ago [flagged] kelnos 6 days ago That... doesn't make any sense. tonymet 6 days ago If the odds were only 1% , how did 14 people die ?You’re not including the lives in your risk assessment .There were 135 events and 14 people died .If you were asked to join mission 136 would you say yes or no?Which risk profile fits: 1% fatality or 10%? 5 replies → wat10000 6 days ago Wat
tonymet 6 days ago [flagged] kelnos 6 days ago That... doesn't make any sense. tonymet 6 days ago If the odds were only 1% , how did 14 people die ?You’re not including the lives in your risk assessment .There were 135 events and 14 people died .If you were asked to join mission 136 would you say yes or no?Which risk profile fits: 1% fatality or 10%? 5 replies → wat10000 6 days ago Wat
kelnos 6 days ago That... doesn't make any sense. tonymet 6 days ago If the odds were only 1% , how did 14 people die ?You’re not including the lives in your risk assessment .There were 135 events and 14 people died .If you were asked to join mission 136 would you say yes or no?Which risk profile fits: 1% fatality or 10%? 5 replies →
tonymet 6 days ago If the odds were only 1% , how did 14 people die ?You’re not including the lives in your risk assessment .There were 135 events and 14 people died .If you were asked to join mission 136 would you say yes or no?Which risk profile fits: 1% fatality or 10%? 5 replies →
[flagged]
That... doesn't make any sense.
If the odds were only 1% , how did 14 people die ?
You’re not including the lives in your risk assessment .
There were 135 events and 14 people died .
If you were asked to join mission 136 would you say yes or no?
Which risk profile fits: 1% fatality or 10%?
5 replies →
Wat