← Back to context

Comment by X-Ryl669

5 days ago

This is bullshit. Read section 7 paragraph b of the AGPLv3 license, and you'll see that OnlyOffice did what they were allowed to do. The Nextcloud blog here is spreading FUD on their partner which will likely cause more damage to them if OO's lawyer starts to have a look on this. People don't read license text, but they should, because they think AGPL is like GPL which is not the case, they are additional restrictions to the former.

The FSF has specifically stated that 7(b) does not apply to branding and requiring such is a violation of 7(b) that may be removed.

>The Nextcloud blog here is spreading FUD on their partner

are neowin and nextcloud affiliated somehow? or which nextcloud blog are you referring to?