Comment by 2muchcoffeeman
14 days ago
I’m surprised they went with outlook rather than something like thunderbird. And I’m surprised they are burning power on an os that can run outlook.
14 days ago
I’m surprised they went with outlook rather than something like thunderbird. And I’m surprised they are burning power on an os that can run outlook.
NASA is a large government organization. Microsoft Outlook is understandable. I assumed they were reading their normal email.
Laptop uses negligible power. The solar panels generate eight houses worth of power (they don't give number).
A Macbook Neo can run outlook just fine and pulls what, 20 watts?
I would be fascinated to see the actual measured power consumption at baseline and when it's actually running Outlook
[dead]