← Back to context

Comment by hirako2000

12 hours ago

There is an argument to make that tools that speed up a process whilst keeping acuity intact are legitimate.

LLMs, the way they typically get used, are solely to save time by handing over nearly the entire process. In that sense acuity can't remain intact, even less so improving over time.

So?

  • You previous comment reads as if LLMs get some unjustified different treatment.

    Do you agree the different treatment is justified ? (Many do not). Or are you asking , so what if acuity is diminished so long as an LLM does the job equally well?