← Back to context

Comment by bambushu

8 hours ago

The letterpress analogy is good but misses something. With letterpress you lost a craft skill. With AI coding you risk losing the ability to evaluate the output. Those are different problems.

I use AI agents for coding every day. The agent handles boilerplate and scaffolding faster than I ever could. But when it produces a subtle architectural mistake, you need enough understanding to catch it. The agent won't tell you it made a bad choice.

What actually helps is building review into the workflow. I run automated code reviews on everything the agent produces before it ships. Not because the code is bad, usually it's fine. But the one time in ten that it isn't, you need someone who understands what the code should be doing.