← Back to context Comment by carlosjobim 11 hours ago You can verify by running the code and see if it works. 3 comments carlosjobim Reply mattmanser 5 hours ago Seriously? The article is about scientists learning to do science, not programming.I know we're not supposed to say RTFA, but your comment really takes the cake. carlosjobim 4 hours ago My mistake then. There's so much AI discussion here on HN from the developer perspective, that it's easy to get lost.But why wouldn't my comment apply to all science? You have to make experiments and gather evidence, otherwise it's not science, it's just academia. greedo 35 minutes ago If you read the article, it covers much of this. It's not just gathering evidence, but evaluating the data you've collected.
mattmanser 5 hours ago Seriously? The article is about scientists learning to do science, not programming.I know we're not supposed to say RTFA, but your comment really takes the cake. carlosjobim 4 hours ago My mistake then. There's so much AI discussion here on HN from the developer perspective, that it's easy to get lost.But why wouldn't my comment apply to all science? You have to make experiments and gather evidence, otherwise it's not science, it's just academia. greedo 35 minutes ago If you read the article, it covers much of this. It's not just gathering evidence, but evaluating the data you've collected.
carlosjobim 4 hours ago My mistake then. There's so much AI discussion here on HN from the developer perspective, that it's easy to get lost.But why wouldn't my comment apply to all science? You have to make experiments and gather evidence, otherwise it's not science, it's just academia. greedo 35 minutes ago If you read the article, it covers much of this. It's not just gathering evidence, but evaluating the data you've collected.
greedo 35 minutes ago If you read the article, it covers much of this. It's not just gathering evidence, but evaluating the data you've collected.
Seriously? The article is about scientists learning to do science, not programming.
I know we're not supposed to say RTFA, but your comment really takes the cake.
My mistake then. There's so much AI discussion here on HN from the developer perspective, that it's easy to get lost.
But why wouldn't my comment apply to all science? You have to make experiments and gather evidence, otherwise it's not science, it's just academia.
If you read the article, it covers much of this. It's not just gathering evidence, but evaluating the data you've collected.