← Back to context

Comment by vovavili

12 hours ago

[flagged]

Lol at eating just plants as being expensive. You do know where animals that are eaten get their food right?

Would you say the same if they refused to serve kosher/halal meals for Muslim/Jewish patients?

UK law protects some philosophical beliefs equally to religions. (what qualifies is a bit of a mess as it's all case law)

(On a practical note, I imagine it's easier for hospitals to just serve vegan food for anyone who is vegetarian/Muslim/Jewish rather than have specific kosher/halal meals)

  • Religion tends to be more constitutive to a person's self-identity than purity signalling dietary trends.

    • Setting aside the fact that there are multiple very old, very large religions that are nearly or actually vegan (e.g., Jainism), or that people raised vegan can't easily digest meat or animal products, why on earth do you feel that you or a hospital worker are qualified to determine the beliefs making up someone's identity, when you know absolutely nothing about them?

Actually the subsidies mostly go to diary farming. Vegan food is cheap to produce but mostly not subsidised. This, plus the (no) economy of scale makes the shelf prices sometimes slightly higher, eg soy milk vs defatted milk.

Vegetables, legumes, nuts, and grains are not expensive, and veganism is a protected class in the UK.

  • Yeah but when you're mad at a nation not force-feeding meat to vegans you have to come up with some reason why the vegans are bad.