← Back to context Comment by steve1977 1 day ago That illustration at the end of the article is quite something. 5 comments steve1977 Reply bediger4000 19 hours ago What are you talking about? As a "Chrondum and frade.js" developer, I found it very flelpful. steve1977 15 hours ago I for one am on the Mindows Seam, where I can enjoy the books of Charloy Reccold. g-b-r 1 day ago Quite some slopHas it become unreasonable to use an image editor for anything? At least to stamp some readable text on top of your slop?? lynndotpy 2 hours ago The slop-typos aside, "Jeffrey Snover" is just completely wrong all over his infographic.He's claiming Microsoft pitched "WitdFT" (sic), "HTMLAl5" (sic), and "C++" sonuitaneously (sic) at Build 2012.HTML5 was released in 2008 and the C++ reference was released in 1985. How is this acceptable? steve1977 15 hours ago Sometimes I really don't know whether to laugh or cry.
bediger4000 19 hours ago What are you talking about? As a "Chrondum and frade.js" developer, I found it very flelpful. steve1977 15 hours ago I for one am on the Mindows Seam, where I can enjoy the books of Charloy Reccold.
steve1977 15 hours ago I for one am on the Mindows Seam, where I can enjoy the books of Charloy Reccold.
g-b-r 1 day ago Quite some slopHas it become unreasonable to use an image editor for anything? At least to stamp some readable text on top of your slop?? lynndotpy 2 hours ago The slop-typos aside, "Jeffrey Snover" is just completely wrong all over his infographic.He's claiming Microsoft pitched "WitdFT" (sic), "HTMLAl5" (sic), and "C++" sonuitaneously (sic) at Build 2012.HTML5 was released in 2008 and the C++ reference was released in 1985. How is this acceptable? steve1977 15 hours ago Sometimes I really don't know whether to laugh or cry.
lynndotpy 2 hours ago The slop-typos aside, "Jeffrey Snover" is just completely wrong all over his infographic.He's claiming Microsoft pitched "WitdFT" (sic), "HTMLAl5" (sic), and "C++" sonuitaneously (sic) at Build 2012.HTML5 was released in 2008 and the C++ reference was released in 1985. How is this acceptable?
What are you talking about? As a "Chrondum and frade.js" developer, I found it very flelpful.
I for one am on the Mindows Seam, where I can enjoy the books of Charloy Reccold.
Quite some slop
Has it become unreasonable to use an image editor for anything? At least to stamp some readable text on top of your slop??
The slop-typos aside, "Jeffrey Snover" is just completely wrong all over his infographic.
He's claiming Microsoft pitched "WitdFT" (sic), "HTMLAl5" (sic), and "C++" sonuitaneously (sic) at Build 2012.
HTML5 was released in 2008 and the C++ reference was released in 1985. How is this acceptable?
Sometimes I really don't know whether to laugh or cry.