← Back to context

Comment by eloisant

9 hours ago

I tried it on my mac, for coding, and I wasn't really impressed compared to Qwen.

I guess there are things it's better at?

5 comments

eloisant

Reply
nkohari  8 hours ago

You're comparing apples to oranges there. Qwen 3.5 is a much larger model at 397B parameters vs. Gemma's 31B. Gemma will be better at answering simple questions and doing basic automation, and codegen won't be it's strong suit.

  • kgeist  8 hours ago

    Qwen3.5 comes in various sizes (including 27B), and judging by the posts on HN, /LocalLlama etc., it seems to be better at logic/reasoning/coding/tool calling compared to Gemma 4, while Gemma 4 is better at creative writing and world knowledge (basically nothing changed from the Qwen3 vs. Gemma3 era)

    • Mil0dV  8 hours ago

      Does this also apply to gemma's 26B-A4B vs say Qwens 35B-A3B?

      I'm not sure if I can make the 35B-A3B work with my 32GB machine

  • tredre3  8 hours ago

    Gemma 4 31B is still not impressive at coding compare to even Qwen 3.5 27B. It's just not its strong suit.

    So far gemma 4 seems excellent at role playing, document analysis, and decent at making agentic decisions.

    • gigatexal  8 hours ago

      This has been my experience as well, Qwen via Ollama locally has been very very impressive.