Comment by Avamander

> what you quoted was about the user getting informed whether their system is compromised, which is the job of a secure boot chain

User being informed means they have to know what a compromised system would entail. That alone is a huge and frankly impossible thing to expect from regular people.

> Most users won't even be bothered to choose and that's fine too, but with remote attestation, it's not the user who decides even if they want to.

> And we don't need random developers looking at our devices to consider them trustworthy, it's none of their business and it's a big mistake to let them.

Then you can't demand those developers trust your device.