← Back to context Comment by gchamonlive 6 hours ago What about the analysis evidences? 8 comments gchamonlive Reply Retr0id 5 hours ago You mean the Claude output? The same claude that has "regressed to the point it cannot be trusted"? gchamonlive 5 hours ago What you saying the OP fabricated/hallucinated the evidence? Retr0id 4 hours ago I'm just saying it's epistemically unrigorous to the point of being equivalent to anecdata. 5 replies →
Retr0id 5 hours ago You mean the Claude output? The same claude that has "regressed to the point it cannot be trusted"? gchamonlive 5 hours ago What you saying the OP fabricated/hallucinated the evidence? Retr0id 4 hours ago I'm just saying it's epistemically unrigorous to the point of being equivalent to anecdata. 5 replies →
gchamonlive 5 hours ago What you saying the OP fabricated/hallucinated the evidence? Retr0id 4 hours ago I'm just saying it's epistemically unrigorous to the point of being equivalent to anecdata. 5 replies →
Retr0id 4 hours ago I'm just saying it's epistemically unrigorous to the point of being equivalent to anecdata. 5 replies →
You mean the Claude output? The same claude that has "regressed to the point it cannot be trusted"?
What you saying the OP fabricated/hallucinated the evidence?
I'm just saying it's epistemically unrigorous to the point of being equivalent to anecdata.
5 replies →