← Back to context Comment by rebolek 5 hours ago Why do you want to destroy Wikipedia? 8 comments rebolek Reply bryan0 5 hours ago I don't. that's why I am working with Wikipedia editors to help improve it. For example policies on aligning agents with wikipedia standards. This a topic that requires thought, not knee-jerk reactions. burnte 4 hours ago Their current policy of no AI bots is fine. No need to improve it, you can't. bryan0 4 hours ago The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved. 2 replies → TRiG_Ireland 4 hours ago You clearly have no understanding of the principle of consent.If you don't want to destroy Wikipedia, why are you acting like this? russdill 2 hours ago I'm suspect that many of his responses here are written by AI. th0ma5 4 hours ago [dead]
bryan0 5 hours ago I don't. that's why I am working with Wikipedia editors to help improve it. For example policies on aligning agents with wikipedia standards. This a topic that requires thought, not knee-jerk reactions. burnte 4 hours ago Their current policy of no AI bots is fine. No need to improve it, you can't. bryan0 4 hours ago The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved. 2 replies → TRiG_Ireland 4 hours ago You clearly have no understanding of the principle of consent.If you don't want to destroy Wikipedia, why are you acting like this? russdill 2 hours ago I'm suspect that many of his responses here are written by AI. th0ma5 4 hours ago [dead]
burnte 4 hours ago Their current policy of no AI bots is fine. No need to improve it, you can't. bryan0 4 hours ago The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved. 2 replies →
bryan0 4 hours ago The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved. 2 replies →
TRiG_Ireland 4 hours ago You clearly have no understanding of the principle of consent.If you don't want to destroy Wikipedia, why are you acting like this? russdill 2 hours ago I'm suspect that many of his responses here are written by AI.
I don't. that's why I am working with Wikipedia editors to help improve it. For example policies on aligning agents with wikipedia standards. This a topic that requires thought, not knee-jerk reactions.
Their current policy of no AI bots is fine. No need to improve it, you can't.
The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved.
2 replies →
You clearly have no understanding of the principle of consent.
If you don't want to destroy Wikipedia, why are you acting like this?
I'm suspect that many of his responses here are written by AI.
[dead]