← Back to context Comment by rebolek 13 hours ago Why do you want to destroy Wikipedia? 8 comments rebolek Reply bryan0 13 hours ago I don't. that's why I am working with Wikipedia editors to help improve it. For example policies on aligning agents with wikipedia standards. This a topic that requires thought, not knee-jerk reactions. burnte 13 hours ago Their current policy of no AI bots is fine. No need to improve it, you can't. bryan0 12 hours ago The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved. 2 replies → TRiG_Ireland 13 hours ago You clearly have no understanding of the principle of consent.If you don't want to destroy Wikipedia, why are you acting like this? russdill 10 hours ago I'm suspect that many of his responses here are written by AI. th0ma5 13 hours ago [dead]
bryan0 13 hours ago I don't. that's why I am working with Wikipedia editors to help improve it. For example policies on aligning agents with wikipedia standards. This a topic that requires thought, not knee-jerk reactions. burnte 13 hours ago Their current policy of no AI bots is fine. No need to improve it, you can't. bryan0 12 hours ago The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved. 2 replies → TRiG_Ireland 13 hours ago You clearly have no understanding of the principle of consent.If you don't want to destroy Wikipedia, why are you acting like this? russdill 10 hours ago I'm suspect that many of his responses here are written by AI. th0ma5 13 hours ago [dead]
burnte 13 hours ago Their current policy of no AI bots is fine. No need to improve it, you can't. bryan0 12 hours ago The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved. 2 replies →
bryan0 12 hours ago The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved. 2 replies →
TRiG_Ireland 13 hours ago You clearly have no understanding of the principle of consent.If you don't want to destroy Wikipedia, why are you acting like this? russdill 10 hours ago I'm suspect that many of his responses here are written by AI.
I don't. that's why I am working with Wikipedia editors to help improve it. For example policies on aligning agents with wikipedia standards. This a topic that requires thought, not knee-jerk reactions.
Their current policy of no AI bots is fine. No need to improve it, you can't.
The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved.
2 replies →
You clearly have no understanding of the principle of consent.
If you don't want to destroy Wikipedia, why are you acting like this?
I'm suspect that many of his responses here are written by AI.
[dead]