← Back to context

Comment by vrganj

2 hours ago

To take this logic to it's extreme: Would you have signed up for a job in Nazi Germany that required clearance?

If not, it's all down to value judgements and your personal evaluation of the current power structures.

Personally, I would feel guilty if I did anything that empowered the Trump regime.

First, referencing "Nazi" has an age old tradition of immediately meaning you lose the debate. That's back to old Usenet and mailing list ethics.

Regardless, absolutely, yes, I would take a job in Nazi Germany which required clearance, if that job was to feed poor children. What the hell? I literally used feeding babies as an example, please provide some context in where innocent babies should be left to starve. Children are literally the absolute concept of innocence, and a baby is beyond culpability!

That is... unless you're advocating some form of weird let babies starve, because of the crimes of their parents?! Which is effectively along the lines of suggesting ethnic cleansing???

Any form of ideological stance which is this extreme, is realistically actually inline with fascism, for it puts politics before people.

  • > First, referencing "Nazi" has an age old tradition of immediately meaning you lose the debate.

    True. Though to be frank, before typing my longer response I did consider just telling you the same about the “but forget everything else and think of the children” line of reasoning.