Comment by croemer

Pangram doesn't reliably detect individual LLM-generated phrases or paragraphs among human written text.

It seems to look at sections of ~300 words. And for one section at least it has low confidence.

I tested it by getting ChatGPT to add a paragraph to one of my sister comments. Result is "100% human" when in fact it's only 75% human.

Pangram test result: https://www.pangram.com/history/1ee3ce96-6ae5-4de7-9d91-5846...

ChatGPT session where it added a paragraph that Pangram misses: https://chatgpt.com/share/69d4faff-1e18-8329-84fa-6c86fc8258...