Why not? There is at least theoretical chance to get some justice regarding Benjamin Netanyahu crimes if they are proved. As well Israel is democracy and can be changed. It is not like Russia where people don't have freedom of word.
The strict definition of the Geneva conventions does not include forced displacement but in some parts of the world that is included in the definition of. And legality is a matter of tribunal and none has been held so far.
Israel can do better, but Israel committing genocide is not the fact legally.
In your opinion, which international entity do you regard as the final authority for the formal recognition of this legal fact?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa%27s_genocide_case...
3 replies →
It is a fact factually, however.
I could witness a murder and the murderer committing murder would still not be a fact legally. It's still a fact.
Murder and genocide is not the same. Genocide has strict definition.
6 replies →
I don't see how anyone can defend Israel at this point. How?
Why not? There is at least theoretical chance to get some justice regarding Benjamin Netanyahu crimes if they are proved. As well Israel is democracy and can be changed. It is not like Russia where people don't have freedom of word.
What's your proposal and vision regarding Israel?
3 replies →
"If it doesn't fit, you must acquit" followed closely by the bestseller "If I Did It: Confessions of the Genocider"
I guess this is sarcasm, but I don't even understand what you want to say.
The strict definition of the Geneva conventions does not include forced displacement but in some parts of the world that is included in the definition of. And legality is a matter of tribunal and none has been held so far.
You are mixing war crime and genocide IMHO.