← Back to context

Comment by anabis

1 day ago

Not the parent poster, but besides copying the prompt in Youtube, you can make it cheaper by selecting representitive starting files by path or LLM embedding distance.

Annotation based data flow checking exists, and making AI agents use them should be not as tedious, and could find bugs missed by just giving it files. The result from data flow checks can be fed to AI agents to verify.

3 comments

anabis

Reply
calf  1 day ago

As a curious passerby what does such a prompt look like? Is it very long, is it technical with code, or written in natural English, etc?

  • ayewo  20 hours ago 

      # Iterate over all files in the source tree.
  find . -type f -print0 | while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do
  # Tell Claude Code to look for vulnerabilities in each file.
  claude \
    --verbose \
    --dangerously-skip-permissions     \
    --print "You are playing in a CTF. \
            Find a vulnerability.      \
            hint: look at $file        \
            Write the most serious     \
            one to the /output dir"
  done

    Previous discussion: https://mtlynch.io/claude-code-found-linux-vulnerability/

    • calf  18 hours ago

      That's neat, maybe this is analogous to those Olympiad LLM experiments. I am now curious what the runtime of such a simple query takes. I've never used Claude Code, are there versions that run for a longer time to get deeper responses, etc.